首页> 外文OA文献 >Between the cosmopolitan and the parochial: the immigrant gentrifier in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
【2h】

Between the cosmopolitan and the parochial: the immigrant gentrifier in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

机译:在世界主义者和狭och主义者之间:洛杉矶韩国城的移民绅士。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper questions the currently lopsided relationship between the cosmopolitan and the\udparochial, in which the former is favored both conceptually and empirically. In response, we\udpropose a relational framework for bringing them into conversation, simultaneously recasting\udand re-animating longstanding debates via three framing devices – the process of\udrelationality/territoriality, disposition, and spaces of encounter – embedded in and through the\udsubject of the immigrant-gentrifier in Koreatown, Los Angeles, itself a novel category that\udhas hitherto eluded systematic research. We present the results of 25 interviews of Korean\udimmigrant-gentrifiers and 10 key informant interviews. The results constitute a parochial\udcritique that emerges as a series of conflicted paradoxes but also productive tensions:\udbetween an ostensibly transnational process compromised by a profoundly homegrown,\udparochial set of investors and outlooks; between a set of dispositions that seek inner-city\uddiversity and density, yet simultaneously sheltered from its spillover costs; and spaces of\udencounter marked by a gap between the promise of truly open spaces and the reality of\udguarded and self-segregated ones. Ultimately, this paper does double duty – conceptually\udrebalancing the cosmopolitan-parochial relationship, but in doing so empirically elevating the\udemergence of the understudied immigrant-gentrifier category.
机译:本文质疑国际大都市与“都市世界”之间目前不平衡的关系,其中前者在概念上和经验上都受到青睐。作为回应,我们提出了一种关系框架,以使他们进行对话,同时通过三种框架设备(嵌入/通过嵌入的\非关系/地域性,处境和相遇的过程)重播\ ud并重新为长期辩论进行动画处理。洛杉矶Koreatown的移民-绅士化进程的udsubject本身是迄今为止从未进行过系统研究的新颖类别。我们提供了25个针对韩国\移民移民的访谈和10个主要信息提供者访谈的结果。结果构成了狭\的\批评,出现了一系列矛盾的悖论,但也产生了生产性紧张局势:\在表面上的跨国进程之间,受到了极其本土化的\\稀疏的投资者和前景的损害;在寻求城市内部\多样性和密度的同时却避免了其溢出成本的一系列配置之间; \ udencounter的空间以真正开放的空间的承诺与\保护的和自我隔离的空间之间的差距为特征。最终,本文承担了双重责任–从概念上\平衡了都市与狭och的关系,但这样做却从经验上提高了被研究不足的移民-绅士阶级的\弱势地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号